The November 23, 2025, referendum concerning the Law on Assistance in Voluntary Termination of Life generated significant concern within the medical community. A formal statement highlighted a critical issue: the unauthorized deployment of referendum propaganda. This activity was deemed a violation, specifically regarding its execution within public health facilities.
The press release detailed several irregularities observed during the campaign. These included the improper display of leaflets promoting a vote against the law within healthcare settings. Furthermore, the dissemination of other propaganda content aimed at discouraging support for the assistance law was also noted.
According to the Supreme Court’s ruling, these actions represented an overreach of permissible expression. The court determined that the propaganda constituted an illegitimate referendum campaign. This campaign’s intent was to unduly influence the voters’ decision-making process.
Essentially, the court recognized that the unauthorized distribution of propaganda blurred the lines between legitimate opinion and manipulative campaigning. The Supreme Court’s judgment underscored the importance of maintaining a neutral environment surrounding the referendum and preventing any interference with the voters’ ability to make an informed choice regarding the assistance law.
Topics: #referendum #propaganda #assistance
