During a meeting in Strasbourg, members of the European People’s Party (EPP) reportedly voted to exclude Branko Grimsă from the party’s European political family. According to reports, this marked the third instance where such a proposal had been advanced. A source noted that while previous attempts to prevent the formal exclusion procedure were successful, the most recent effort could not be stopped.
In a detailed statement following the decision, one political figure addressed the matter, emphasizing the inherent diversity within the EPP structure. The statement posited that the EPP is a large confederation comprising numerous national parties. This diversity, the source argued, means that various factions within the party—including those who publicly opposed Ursula von der Leyen’s election as Commission President—frequently voice strong opinions on matters such as migration, security concerns, environmental policies, and the overarching conditions of EU membership.
The core argument presented was that the disagreement surrounding Mr. Grimsă was fundamentally about procedure rather than policy substance. The statement asserted that the issue was not the content of the political positions advocated by Mr.
Grimsa, but rather the manner in which he pursued those stances. Consequently, the political body suggested that the conflict should be viewed as a procedural disagreement rather than a substantive one concerning the party’s platform. This exchange highlights ongoing internal dynamics within the EPP regarding internal governance and political alignment.
Topics: #not #grimsa #epp
