“A yellow card was a warning, we could have shown a red one in the autumn”

A spokesperson for the Civil Initiative for Ljubljana, Klemen Fajs, issued a statement following Sunday’s referendum, noting that the vote did not reach the required threshold for a no-confidence measure. Fajs interpreted the number of voters who opposed the recent parking ordinance as an indication of broader dissatisfaction with the current administration’s leadership. He suggested that voter turnout for the referendum may have been affected by the timing, occurring during the peak of the summer holidays.

Addressing the specific policy issues, Fajs urged the mayor to reconsider the introduction of parking regulations in areas such as Rudnik, Galjevica, and Bilečanska street. However, Fajs stressed that the referendum was not the sole objective of the initiative. According to the statement, the event marked the start of a wider civic dialogue concerning the management of Ljubljana.

He framed the gathering as a beginning for discussions about the city’s trajectory, particularly concerning rising costs of living and a perceived cultural shift making the city feel increasingly unfamiliar to its residents. The statement positioned the referendum results not merely as a vote on parking, but as a reflection of public sentiment regarding the city’s governance. Fajs emphasized that the conversation initiated by the referendum was about collective awareness, aiming to bring together citizens who feel the character of Ljubljana is changing.

Topics: #referendum #not #mayor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *